BSN sued

Subject: BSN sued Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:31 pm

I just found out that BSN was being sued .It seems that the plaintiffs claim that none of the BSN products contain the ingredient CEM3 (Creatine Ethyl Esther Malate) like they're supposed to but instead regular creatine monohydrate .
That's news to me and I was wondering if you guys in North America had heard anything about this .

http://supplementpolice.com/Complaint.pdf

Newbie Age : 41 Joined : 13 Oct 2007 Posts : 106

Wow, that is heavy!

I mean these guys at BSN not only false labeled but totally pulled stuff out of the air.... not only inventing a new name but claiming they have a patent for it too... tsk tsk - I hope they get what they deserve.

I've never taken any of their supplements but after this I seriously doubt I ever will.

Thanks for the link! i agree or great !

_________________
The greatest discovery of my generation is that human beings can alter their lives by altering their attitudes of mind.
- William James

www.bodyspace.com/valenti100

Subject: Re: BSN sued Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:37 pm

Subject: Re: BSN sued Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:42 pm

Damn...does that mean my Syntha-6 is really just brown sugar?? lol!

Glad I've never taken anything other than that.
_________________
Anything not worth doing is worth not doing well. Think about it.

Subject: Re: BSN sued Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:15 pm

Subject: Re: BSN sued Wed Dec 05, 2007 9:30 pm

Subject: Re: BSN sued Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:16 pm

i saw the report and syntha-6 wasnt in the list of items..... it was cell mass, n.o.-expode and nitrix.
but it does make ya wonder about all the other products.
_________________
When you lose, don't lose the lesson.

www.myspace.com/futrpro

Subject: Re: BSN sued Sat Dec 29, 2007 7:35 pm

Any updates on this? I just watched 3 people buy some no-explode and nitrix today. I told them about bsn getting sued. they didn't believe me. oh well.
_________________
Anything not worth doing is worth not doing well. Think about it.